http://brontemedia.com/2007/11/14/industryxml-sub-heading-can-you-please-upload-your-poker-hands/ There are those who experiment and those who follow the formula Wed, 07 Jan 2009 08:52:44 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5 http://brontemedia.com/2007/11/14/industryxml-sub-heading-can-you-please-upload-your-poker-hands/#comment-25393 nikiscevak Fri, 16 Nov 2007 15:02:15 +0000 http://brontemedia.com/2007/11/14/industryxml-sub-heading-can-you-please-upload-your-poker-hands/#comment-25393 Well, I am thinking that people tend to overplay certain hands. So AK for instance, they probably overbet and lose a dispropotionate amount because it is a 'premium hand'. Whereas a small suited connector like 4-5, might pay off to a larger degree or a small pocket pair that flops trips and cracks a larger pocket pair. Well, I am thinking that people tend to overplay certain hands. So AK for instance, they probably overbet and lose a dispropotionate amount because it is a ‘premium hand’. Whereas a small suited connector like 4-5, might pay off to a larger degree or a small pocket pair that flops trips and cracks a larger pocket pair.

]]> http://brontemedia.com/2007/11/14/industryxml-sub-heading-can-you-please-upload-your-poker-hands/#comment-25358 i Fri, 16 Nov 2007 11:14:54 +0000 http://brontemedia.com/2007/11/14/industryxml-sub-heading-can-you-please-upload-your-poker-hands/#comment-25358 A very interesting idea! My initial thought is that as you build a larger and larger corpus won't you find the winner tends towards the underlying statistical probability of a given hand winning (i.e. in the long run the best hand wins)? A very interesting idea! My initial thought is that as you build a larger and larger corpus won’t you find the winner tends towards the underlying statistical probability of a given hand winning (i.e. in the long run the best hand wins)?

]]>